The lines, of course, were irritating, but the real issue lay with the reasons behind the delays: the unorganized pat-downs and metal detector-wandings. While the editorial board prizes security as much as anyone, and certainly appreciates Vanderbilt’s dedication therein, the pat-downs seemed both a little unnecessary and pointless. Many students over the age of 21, knowing that alcohol flowed freely beyond the gates, went through the under-21 lines simply to save time.

With bulky rain coats Friday and jackets Saturday, the check points were greatly slowed, and, as many students managed to bring concealed objects like cameras in without ever coming under scrutiny from security, it leaves one to wonder somewhat about the effectiveness of the tactics. At the same time, the fault does not lie solely with security for the long lines for Colbie Caillat Friday night — those disappointed with the wait-time may have done well to consider braving the rain a few minutes earlier to avoid missing any of her performance, which was sure to be popular among female undergraduates, in particular.

More important, however, the exit alcohol policy raises a few questions of safety. As has always been the policy, Rites-goers were not permitted to leave the event with alcohol. The editorial board understands there are probably concerns about liability for those under 21, particularly considering the event takes place on campus, which should not be taken lightly. However, with security informing exiting patrons they must either throw away alcohol or chug it, health must be taken into account. With a fair share of students in an intoxicated state, probably not best equipped to make solid decisions, a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum may be dangerous. In the past few years binge drinking and its risks have been featured prominently on the national scene; the policy seems somewhat antiquated in addressing those concerns.

Hopefully, next year’s Rites will be a little more practical with the realities of Vanderbilt’s best weekend.